Bodum v. Williams Sonoma - Comparison of Bodum and WS French press C Level Executive List product pages. Presenting a pitch: factors to consider In the MTM/Amazon case, the court essentially concluded that there was no initial conflict of interest due to a few factors: The Amazon search results page says it shows "related" results. The product pages listed on this page do not represent that they were Multi Time Machine watches. Consumers must reasonably C Level Executive List recognize that the products shown are too inexpensive to be Multi.

Time Machine watches. From my layman's perspective, Williams-Sonoma C Level Executive List may not have the same mitigating factors as Amazon. Customers of the williams-sonoma.com site expected to see Bodum products on the site. Similarly, consumers searching Google for “bodum french press” were presented with a Google search results page where the Williams-Sonoma “related search results” page for “bodum” featured prominently in the top position.

The products shown closely resemble Bodum branded C Level Executive List products, so those familiar with Bodum items would not be likely to recognize them as different from bona fide branded products. The prices are quite similar. How the Bodum French Press page on Williams-Sonoma.com appeared in Google search results. How Williams-Sonoma.com's Bodum C Level Executive List French Press page appeared in Google search results Damages and corrective advertising As I presented during a session at the SMX West conference recently.